ANTELMAN

v.

DECATALDO, REVENUE AGENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (87 total)

• Hicks v. State, 468 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …f any impropriety relating to the instant action. The state’s reliance upon United States v. Snyder, 707 F. 2d 139 (5th Cir.1983), and United States v. Hobson, 672 F. 2d 825 (11th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 677 F. 2d 117 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906, 103 S.Ct. 208, 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982), is misplaced. In both of those cases, the alleged impropriety arose out of the disqualified attorney’s in [*1047] volvement in the same transaction for which the defendant/client was charged. See also United St…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (U.S. 1984)
  …F. 2d 798, 801 (CA6 1983); United States v. Agosto, 675 F. 2d 965, 968, n. 1 (CA8), cert. denied after remand and affirmance sub nom. Gustafson v. United States, 459 U. S. 834 (1982); United States v. Hobson, 672 F. 2d 825, 826 (CA11), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 906 (1982). The Ninth Circuit has held that such orders are not immediately appealable. United States v. Greger, 657 F. 2d 1109, 1110-1113 (1981), cert. denied, 461 U. S. 913 (1983). Title 18 U. S. C. § 3731 provides a statutory exception to the fina…
• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ted only when the defendant can demonstrate that a joint trial will result in “specific and compelling prejudice” to the conduct of his defense. Zielie, 734 F. 2d at 1464; United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F. 2d 655, 660 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906, 103 S.Ct. 208, 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982). It is not enough for the defendant to show that acquittal would have been more likely had the defendant been tried separately, since some degree of bias is inherent in a joint trial. Walker, 720 F. 2d at 1533;…