NORBERG, TAX ADMINISTRATOR OF RHODE ISLAND

v.

GEORGE, INC.

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1992)
  …lable even if it would not be admissible under rules of procedure); United States v. Steele, 685 F. 2d 793, 808 (3d Cir.) (deposition testimony was admissible against criminal defendant [*502] under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908, 103 S.Ct. 213, 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982). I see no reason why the same should not hold true under Florida’s procedural and evidentiary rules. Accord Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 804.2, at 670-71 (1992). It is generally accepted that when a depositio…
• Green v. State, 667 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …have the federal courts, allowing the use of discovery depositions as substantive evidence in criminal trials pursuant to the parallel provisions of the Federal Evidence Code, see United States v. Steele, 685 F. 2d 793, 808 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908, 103 S.Ct. 213, 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982), I feel bound to follow case law which I consider bars such use in Florida criminal trials. I am therefore constrained to dissent from that portion of Judge Barfield’s opinion holding the discovery deposition o…
• Mennonite Bd. of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791 (U.S. 1983)
  …e opportunity to redeem the property following the tax sale. The trial court upheld the Indiana tax sale statute against this constitutional challenge. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed. 427 N. E. 2d 686 (1981). We noted probable jurisdiction, 459 U. S. 908 (1982), and we now reverse. II In Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U. S. 306, 314 (1950), this Court recognized that prior to an action which will affect an interest in life, liberty, or property protected by the Due Process Clause…