BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC.

v.

BUSKIRK

Citator

Cited By

• Maldonado v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 798 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …Clark, 728 F. 2d at 312-13 (couplers “out of alignment beyond the normal play” will not couple automatically); Hallada, 69 N.W. 2d at 680; Buskirk v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 103 Ill.App.3d 414, 59 Ill.Dec. 125, 431 N.E. 2d 410, 412, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 910, 103 S.Ct. 217, 74 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982). Whether or not a proper coupler within normal operation can become misaligned enough to prevent coupling, we believe that, if a railroad may raise a defense of misalignment, it must, at the least, produce evi…
• United States v. Kofoworola Adegbite, 846 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …03 F. 2d 74, 78- 79 (2d Cir.1986), Miranda warnings are given.6 In any event, “the identity of de- that hearing, [*839] fendants is not suppressible under the exclusionary rule.” United States v. Arias, 678 F. 2d 1202, 1206 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 910, 103 S.Ct. 218, 74 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982) (citing United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 100 S.Ct. 1244, 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980)).7 Conclusion The order to suppress the statements of both defendants and the physical evidence obtained from Obalaja is reve…
• Dorothy M. Farish for Shirley F. Farish v. Courion Indus., Inc., 754 F.2d 1111 (4th Cir. 1985)
  …the statute was, in practical, if not altogether in theoretical terms, wholly retrospective. . A similar argument narrowly missed adoption in the case of Whalen v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 684 F. 2d 272, 281 (4th Cir.1982, en banc, 6-4), cert. denied 459 U.S. 910, 103 S.Ct. 216, 74 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). There, however, the technique was sought to be applied to expand a change in existing law, while, in the instant case, it will minimize a change in the common law. See Chesapeake and Ohio Ry. v. Kinzer, 206 Va.…