MIZELL, WARDEN, VIENNA CORRECTIONAL CENTER

v.

WELSH

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, 750 F.2d 970 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …at 717. The parallel between Pearson’s case and Oilman’s is obvious. . Justices Rehnquist and White have indicated as much in their dissent from the denial of certiorari in Miskovsky v. Oklahoma Publishing Co., 654 P. 2d 587 (Okla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 923, 103 S.Ct. 235, 74 L.Ed.2d 186 (1982) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting). In that case, the Justices suggest that the Supreme Court of Oklahoma erred in relying on a rigid opinion/fact dichotomy to determine the truth or falsity of an allegedly libelous st…
• Segar v. Smith, 738 F.2d 1249 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …e considered as cumulative. EEOC v. American National Bank, 652 F. 2d 1176, 1188 (4th Cir.1981) (reliance on “cumulation of evidence including statistics, patterns, practices, general policies or specific instances of discrimination”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 923, 103 S.Ct. 235, 74 L.Ed.2d 186 (1982). Though anecdotal evidence might bolster a plaintiff’s case or reduce the need for strong statistical proof, see Valentino, supra, 674 F. 2d at 69, neither the presence nor the absence of specific anecdotal acco…
• Coates v. Johnson & Johnson, 756 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …rebut plaintiffs’ prima facie case in the manner claimed by plaintiffs, we would have a different issue. See Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 343 n. 24, 97 S.Ct. at 1858 n. 24; EEOC v. American National Bank, 652 F. 2d 1176, 1198 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 923, 103 S.Ct. 235, 74 L.Ed.2d 186 (1982). Considering all the circumstances of this case, we do not believe Judge Leighton underestimated the showing required to rebut plaintiffs’ prima facie case which he found plaintiffs had established. We are sat…