LASCANO

v.

ARKANSAS

Citator

Cited By

• Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1983)
  …s, ultimately awarding some $45,000 to the Sierra Club and some $46,000 to EDF. Sierra Club v. Gorsuch, 217 U. S. App. D. C. 180, 672 F. 2d 33 (1982); Sierra Club v. Gorsuch, 221 U. S. App. D. C. 450, 684 F. 2d 972 (1982). We granted certiorari, 459 U. S. 942 (1982), to consider the important question decided by the Court of Appeals.1 I The question presented by this case is whether it is “appropriate,” within the meaning of § 307(f) of the Clean Air Act, to award attorney’s fees to a party that achiev…
• Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …fact-finding, which we are not permitted to second-guess unless ‘after reviewing the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’” Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F. 2d 245, 252 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942, 103 S.Ct. 254, 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982) (quoting Busche v. Burkee, 649 F. 2d 509, 518 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897, 102 S.Ct. 396, 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981)). Indeed, “[i]n determining whether an award is excessive, we are to accord substantial…
• The Cnty. OF Cook v. Midcon Corp., 773 F.2d 892 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …(3) the resolution of the particular issues was necessary to the court’s judgment,, and (4) those issues are identical to issues raised in the subsequent suit. See, e.g., Whitley v. Seibel, 676 F. 2d [*899] 245, 248 & n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 942, 103 S.Ct. 254, 74 L.Ed.2d 198 (1982); Raper v. Hazelett and Erdal, 114 Ill.App.3d 649, 70 Ill.Dec. 394, 449 N.E. 2d 268 (1983). We first turn to plaintiffs’ central contention that the district court erred in determining that the issues resolved…