MCCARTY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1985)
  …o. of N. C. v. FERC, 587 F. 2d 716, 721 (CA5), cert. denied sub nom. Louisiana v. FERC, 444 U. S. 879 (1979); operation of a mental health facility, Williams v. Eastside Mental [*539] Health Center, Inc., 669 F. 2d 671, 680-681 (CA11), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 976 (1982); and provision of in-house domestic services for the aged and handicapped, Bonnette v. California Health and Welfare Agency, 704 F. 2d 1465, 1472 (CA9 1983), are not entitled to immunity. We find it difficult, if not impossible, to identify…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Felino Rodriguez, 882 F.2d 1059 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …n a finding of an abuse of that discretion.” United States v. Hamilton, 684 F. 2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.) (citing United States v. Czarnecki, 552 F. 2d 698, 702 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939, 97 S.Ct. 2652, 53 L.Ed.2d 257 (1977)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976, 103 S.Ct. 312, 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982). See also United States v. Hatfield, 815 F. 2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1987). In admitting evidence under Rule 404(b), the court must determine whether the evidence is relevant to an issue for which it is admissible…
• United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …e 404(b) is limited. United States v. Hatfield, 815 F. 2d 1068, 1072 (6th Cir.1987). We will reverse a district court’s 404(b) ruling only upon a finding of abuse of discretion. United States v. Hamilton, 684 F. 2d 380, 384 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 976, 103 S.Ct. 312, 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982) (citing United States v. Czarnecki, 552 F. 2d 698, 702 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 939, 97 S.Ct. 2652, 53 L.Ed.2d 257 (1977)). “In determining the admissibility of bad acts evidence under Rule 404(b), a t…