FRANCIS OIL & GAS, INC., ET AL.

v.

EXXON CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1985)
  …6 L.Ed.2d 350, it is clear that Section 212.72 unembellished by any agency interpretations, required the adoption of a single BPCL, upon unitization. See also Francis Oil and Gas, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 687 F. 2d 484, at 488 (TECA 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1010, 103 S.Ct. 365, 74 L.Ed.2d 400 (1982). Under these circumstances, we find that Exxon’s claim that Pennzoil does not control the question of “when” a unit must convert to unit wide accounting is without merit. Apart from Ruling 1975-15, Section 212.…
• Atl. Richfield Co. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 769 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …2). See also Scallop Corp. v. Tully, 705 F. 2d 645 (2d Cir.1983); Coastal States Mktg. Inc. v. New Eng. Petroleum Corp., 604 F. 2d 179, 187 (2d Cir. 1979); Francis Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 687 F. 2d 484, 487 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1010, 103 S.Ct. 365, 74 L.Ed.2d 400 (1982); Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy, 616 F. 2d 1193, 1198 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979). . Scallop Corp. v. Tully, supra note 39, 705 F. 2d at 650; Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F. 2d 912 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 4…
• United States v. Bell, 785 F.2d 640 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …courts, is the reliability of the evidence which the government offers in place of live testimony. See, e.g., United States v. Burkhalter, 588 F. 2d 604, 607 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. McCallum, 677 F. 2d 1024,1026-27 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1010, 103 S.Ct. 365, 74 L.Ed.2d 400 (1982).2 Thus, where the government demonstrates that the burden of producing live testimony would be inordinate and offers in its place hearsay evidence that is demonstrably reliable, it has made a strong showing of g…