HARPER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (84 total)

• United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …se. Other circuits have also permitted an expert to give his opinion that a defendant’s ambiguous conduct is criminal. United States v. Fleishman, 684 F. 2d 1329, 1335— 36 (9th Cir.) (defendant’s role as “lookout” in drug transaction), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044, 103 S.Ct. 464, 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Scavo, 593 F. 2d 837, 840, 843-44 (8th Cir.1979) (defendant’s role in gambling operation); United States v. Masson, 582 F. 2d 961, 963-64 (5th Cir.1978) (same). In light of Carson and these oth…
• United States v. Marabelles, 724 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …a defense “expert.” On review, our Court will reverse only if the District Court abused its wide discretion or committed “manifest error” in excluding that kind of testimony. United States v. Fleishman, 684 F. 2d 1329, 1336 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044, 103 S.Ct. 464, 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). See generally Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416, 91 S.Ct. 814, 823, 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (elements of “abuse of discretion” test). We hold that the District Court did not abuse its…
• Lightbourne v. Dugger, 829 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …s of a reward and received none, and where informant received no instructions or directions by the government, despite fact that FBI placed informant in defendant’s cell). See also United States v. Surridge, 687 F. 2d 250 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044, 103 S.Ct. 465, 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Malik, 680 F. 2d 1162 (7th Cir.1982). . Because the contrary finding would not have fair support in the record as a whole, I need not decide whether the ultimate agency issue, i.e., whether Ch…

  ← 1 / 2 →