CLANCY ET AL.

v.

JARTECH, INC., ET AL.; CLANCY ET AL. V. JARTECH, INC., ET AL.; GUNTER ET UX. V. HUTCHESON ET AL.; THOMPSON V. COVINGTON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.; CHESTNUTT ET AL. V. FOGEL ET AL.; GREYHOUND LINES, INC. V. PRICE; LOCAL 66, BOSTON TEACHERS UNION, AFT, AFL-CIO V. BOSTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE ET AL.; ELLERBE V. OTIS ELEVATOR CO.; REXROAT V. THORELL; STEPAK V. RUTGERS MEDICAL SCHOOL ET AL.; MISKOVSKY V. OKLAHOMA PUBLISHING CO.; FIELDS V. TEXAS; MICHAELIS V. NEBRASKA STATE BAR ASSN.; CAPE V. ZANT, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION CENTER; WILLIAMS V. INDIANA; CHRISTENSEN V. UTAH; JOHN V. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; KNOTT V. MABRY, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; DIN V. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Cooling Sys. & Flexibles, Inc. v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., 777 F.2d 485 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …Publishing Corp., 745 F. 2d 142 (2d Cir.1984), we predicate an award under 17 U.S.C. § 505 (1982) on such a finding. See Jartech, Inc. v. Clancy, 666 F. 2d 403, 407 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879, 103 S.Ct. 175, 74 L.Ed.2d 143, reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1059, 103 S.Ct. 477, 74 L.Ed.2d 624, second reh’g denied, 463 U.S. 1237, 104 S.Ct. 33, 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983); cf. See v. Durang, 711 F. 2d 141, 144 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (weak argument on substantial similarity not so frivolous as to justify an aw…
• Garnett William Cape v. Francis, 741 F.2d 1287 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …and denied a petition for rehearing on March 24, 1982. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on October 4, 1982. Cape v. Zant, 459 U.S. 882, 103 S.Ct. 181, 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982). A petition for rehearing was denied on November 29, 1982, 459 U.S. 1059, 103 S.Ct. 479, 74 L.Ed.2d 626 (1982). On December 17, 1982, the petitioner filed the present petition for a writ of habe-as corpus in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division. The district court denied a…
• The Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. for Vernon Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Gordy, 928 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …74 F. 2d 862, 867 (11th Cir.) (refusing to bar defense based on bank officers’ misrepresentations of bank’s financial condition as an agreement within meaning of section 1823(e)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826, 103 S.Ct. 60, 74 L.Ed.2d 63 reh'g denied, 459 U.S. 1059, 103 S.Ct. 477, 74 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982). Although the express warranty in Langley involved terms of the transaction, not the bank’s financial condition, for two reasons the Court’s opinion apparently contemplated including a bank’s misrepresentation…