BARNES

v.

SANZO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (62 total)

• Ashton v. Cory, 780 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …t. at 1230-31; Tully v. Griffin, Inc., 429 U.S. 68, 76, 97 S.Ct. 219, 224, 50 L.Ed.2d 227 (1976). CLVT, citing Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett, 681 F. 2d 1107, 1118-19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943, 102 S.Ct. 1438, 71 L.Ed.2d 655, 459 U.S. 1087, 103 S.Ct. 570, 74 L.Ed.2d 932 (1982), 459 U.S. 1203, 103 S.Ct. 1189, 75 L.Ed.2d 435 (1983), argues it has no plain remedy under California law, since it is not the party from whom the tax is due, and may therefore pay the levy and be ineligible for…
• Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 805 F.2d 974 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …re is no argument that the delay in this case was so outrageous and unreasonable that laches may be established without a showing of prejudice. See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F. 2d 1040, 1044-45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087, 103 S.Ct. 571, 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982); Conagra, Inc., 743 F. 2d at 1517 n. 15. . The court’s finding that the delay was “reasonable” equates with a finding that there was no delay and that the first element of the laches defense had not been establ…
• Iver J. Freeman v. Package Mach. Co., 865 F.2d 1331 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …nvinced that the jury’s verdict is “against the clear weight of the evidence, or is based upon evidence which is false, or will result in a clear miscarriage of justice....” Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F. 2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087, 103 S.Ct. 571, 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982). The mere fact that a contrary verdict may have been equally — or even more easily — supportable furnishes no cogniza [*1334] ble ground for granting a new trial. If the weight of the evidence is not grotesque…