SCOTT

v.

UNITED STATES; SETTLE ET AL. V. ESPIEFS, TRUSTEE; BLUE THUNDER V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (U.S. 1983)
  …plying “totality of the circumstances” test rather than per se rule). See also Wilson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 373, 376, 290 S. E. 2d 442, 446 (“[ajccepting that [Edwards] established a per se exclusionary rule,” but expressing reservation), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1092 (1982); Leuschner, supra, at 497, 433 A. 2d, at 1199 (recognizing uncertainty whether Edwards created per se rule). Perhaps what has caused some confusion is a failure to recognize that the only new element in Edwards was the emphasis on the prosec…
• Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F.2d 621 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …me was a lesser-included offense of the murder charge. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the state habeas court’s denial of relief with respect to the murder and kidnapping convictions. Wilson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 373, 290 S.E. 2d 442, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1092, 103 S.Ct. 580, 74 L.Ed.2d 940 (1982). The state did not cross-appeal from the grant of habeas relief with respect to the firearms conviction.1 Wilson next filed the present habeas petition in federal district court, raising numerous constitutional…
• Brown v. Colonel James O. Palmer, 915 F.2d 1435 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …ical or political messages. The Eighth Circuit has arrived at the same conclusion in a case involving very similar facts. See Persons for Free Speech at SAC v. United States Air Force, 675 F. 2d 1010, 1015-18 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1092, 103 S.Ct. 579, 74 L.Ed.2d 939 (1982). In Persons for Free Speech, the Commander of Offutt Air Force Base denied a request by the plaintiffs to participate in an open house celebration to express their anti-military views. In its en banc ruling, t…

  ← 1 / 2 →