DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR

v.

BLITZ

Citator

Cited By

• Cate v. Oldham, 450 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1984)
  …mitted, or even attempted, to sue its subjects for malicious prosecution. We find only two United States cases which have directly addressed this issue. In City of Long Beach v. Bozek, 31 Cal.3d 527, 645 P. 2d 137, 183 Cal.Rptr. 86 (1982), vacated, 459 U.S. 1095, 103 S.Ct. 712, 74 L.Ed.2d 943 (1983), on remand, 33 Cal.3d 727, 661 P. 2d 1072, 190 Cal.Rptr. 918 (1983) (prior opinion reiterated in its entirety), the Supreme Court of California held that governmental entities may not maintain actions for malici…
• Cypher v. Segal, 501 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …of citizens to petition the state for redress of grievances. In essence, the case recognizes a privilege to sue the state without fear of reprisal. See also City of Long Beach v. Bozek, 31 Cal.3d 527, 183 Cal.Rptr. 86, 645 P. 2d 137 (1982), vacated, 459 U.S. 1095, 103 S.Ct. 712, 74 L.Ed.2d 943 (1983), on remand, 33 Cal.3d 727, 190 Cal.Rptr. 918, 661 P. 2d 1072 (1983) (government entities may not maintain actions for malicious prosecution against those who have sued them unsuccessfully). The court in Cate al…
• Blitz v. Donovan, 740 F.2d 1241 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …by requiring all applicants to answer the following question: “Do you now, or have you within the past five years, publicly advocated the violent overthrow of the Federal Government?” Blitz v. Donovan, 538 F.Supp. 1119, 1123 (D.D. C.1982), vacated, 459 U.S. 1095, 103 S.Ct. 711, 74 L.Ed.2d 943 (1983). VEC further [*1243] specified that any applicant who answered the question affirmatively or refused to answer would not qualify for the CETA program. Id. In January 1982, Ms. Dorothy Blitz sought readmission a…

  ← 1 / 5 →