MILA ET AL.

v.

DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE DENVER, COLORADO, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Cnty. of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State, 470 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1985)
  …States necessarily consented to suit in federal court with respect to enactments under this Clause. See County of Monroe v. Florida, 678 F. 2d 1124 (CA2 1982) (making an analogous argument with respect to Congress’ extradition power), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1104 (1983); Mills Music, Inc. v. Arizona, 591 F. 2d 1278, 1285 (CA9 1979) (making such an argument with respect to Congress’ power over copyright and patents). Thus, they contend, Congress can abrogate the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity and has do…
• Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1989)
  …stitution. See, e. g., United States v. Union Gas Co., 832 F. 2d 1343 (CA3 1987) (case below); In re McVey Trucking, Inc., 812 F. 2d 311 (CA7), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 895 (1987); County of Monroe v. Florida, 678 F. 2d 1124 (CA2 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1104 (1983); Peel v. Florida Dept, of Transportation, 600 F. 2d 1070 (CA5 1979); Mills Music, Inc. v. Arizona, 591 F. 2d 1278 (CA9 1979). Even if we never before had discussed the specific connection between Congress’ authority under the Commerce Clause…
• United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1984)
  …al concerns articulated by the trial court and then later claim that the court abused its discretion in granting the requested continuance. See Jodoin, 672 F. 2d at 238; cf. United States v. Bufalino, 683 F. 2d 639, 646 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1104, 103 S.Ct. 727, 74 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983) (defendant may not claim Speedy Trial Act violation caused by own failure to respond to government motion). Appellants’ third objection to the June 4 continuance is not frivolous. They argue that the district c…