TREEN, GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.

v.

WILLIAMS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1984)
  …e’s right of privacy guaranteed by the First and Ninth Amendments. The District Court rejected appellee’s other constitutional claims. The District Court relied in part on the reasoning of Williams v. Treen, 671 F. 2d 892 (CA5 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1126 (1983), that had held that official conduct in violation of an explicit and clearly established state regulation was per se unreasonable. 671 F. 2d, at 899. These regulations specified in pertinent part: “Upon receiving a report of... a violation…
• Robbins v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …eal is jurisdictional and lack of a timely notice mandates dismissal of an appeal. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 103 S.Ct. 400, 403, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982). Williams v. Treen, 671 F. 2d 892, 895 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1126, 103 S.Ct. 762, 74 L.Ed.2d 977 (1983). We do accept the filing of certain documents other than a formal notice of appeal, if filed within the thirty day limit of Rule 4(a), as the substantial equivalent of a notice of appeal. This Court has repeate…
• Elana Casines v. Murchek, 766 F.2d 1494 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ment order which was “inconsistent with the We-isbrod holding.” The district court premised its denial of qualified immunity to the appellants upon a different ground. Relying upon Williams v. Treen, 671 F. 2d 892, 900 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1126, 103 S.Ct. 762, 74 L.Ed.2d 977 (1983), the district court concluded that the appellants were not enti-tied to qualified immunity because they had violated Casines’s clearly established rights under Florida state law to be dismissed only upon a showi…