VENTURE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

v.

NATIONAL FUEL GAS DISTRIBUTION CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Adams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 764 F.2d 1356 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …a single [*1367] 00aggressive and impulsive sexual desire, but rather that an independent reasoned motive to avoid detection and arrest existed. Proof of this motive must be "very strong.” Riley v. State, 366 So. 2d 19, 22 (Fla. 1978), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1138, 103 S.Ct. 773, 74 L.Ed.2d 985 (1983); Routly v. State, 440 So. 2d 1257, 1263 (Fla.1983). . See also supra notes 4 and 8. . With respect to his attorney’s failure to pursue a claim of incompetency, the petitioner characterizes the ineffective ass…
• Int'l Distrib. Ctrs., Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co., Inc., 812 F.2d 786 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …ce, viewed most favorably to the plaintiff, was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Venture Technology, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Co., 685 F. 2d 41, 45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1007, 103 S.Ct. 362, 74 L.Ed.2d 398 (1982), reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1138, 103 S.Ct. 775, 74 L.Ed.2d 986 (1983). The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that “courts should not permit factfinders to infer conspiracies when such inferences are implausible, because the effect of such practices is often to deter pro-competiti…