PISKACEK

v.

ODESSA COLLEGE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Caldwell v. Miller, 790 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …28 U.S.C. § 1331. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 684, 66 S.Ct. 773, 777, 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); Garza v. Miller, 688 F. 2d 480, 482 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1150, 103 S.Ct. 796, 74 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1983). Hence, we shall review the disposition of Caldwell’s complaint below, not as a dismissal for want of jurisdiction, but as an adjudication of the merits. A. Ban on Group Religious Services. Caldwell claims th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Campbell v. H.G. Miller, 787 F.2d 217 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …nfit for the general population at Marion because they pose a threat to others or to the orderly operation of the institution. See, e.g., McCollum v. Miller, 695 F. 2d 1044 (7th Cir.1982); Garza v. Miller, 688 F. 2d 480 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1150, 103 S.Ct. 796, 74 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1983); Bono v. Saxbe, 620 F. 2d 609 (7th Cir.1980). Campbell, acting pro se, brought two civil rights suits, in May of 1982 and January of 1983 respectively, alleging various violations of his constitutional rights…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Lavarita D. Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …o a particular institution is not subject to audit under the Due Process Clause, although the degree of confinement in one prison may be quite different from that in another. See Garza v. Miller, 688 F. 2d 480, 488 (7th Cir.1982), certiorari denied, 459 U.S. 1150, 103 S.Ct. 796, 74 L.Ed.2d 1000; Shango v. Jurich, 681 F. 2d at 1098. Although the plaintiff is precluded from attacking the classification decision per se, she remains free to challenge the conditions of her confinement, resulting from that classif…