ROSENFIELD ET AL.

v.

NEW ENGLAND MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat'l Bank, 793 F.2d 1541 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …Kerotest Mfg., 342 U.S. at 183-84, 72 S.Ct. at 221-22; Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55, 57 S.Ct. 163, 165-66, 81 L.Ed. 153 (1936); CTI-Container Leasing Corp. v. Uiterwyk Corp., 685 F. 2d 1284, 1288 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173, 103 S.Ct. 820, 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983); Hoover, 611 F. 2d at 1136-37. Applying these principles to the instant case, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the § 1983 suit. First, the parties are substantially diffe…
• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …arch 27, 1983 (Tr. 442). . Intent to distribute may be inferred from the large amount of marijuana (approximately 20,-000 pounds) discovered in the abandoned truck. See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F. 2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173, 103 S.Ct. 820, 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983) (intent to distribute inferred from 600 pounds of marijuana). In addition, intent to distribute may be inferred from the testimony of a DEA agent that the marijuana seized was worth $10,-000,000. (Tr. 1351). .…
• United States v. GAY, 774 F.2d 368 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …982); see United States v. Compton, 704 F. 2d 739, 742 (5th Cir.1983). The “intent to distribute” element is generally established through circumstantial evidence. See United States v. DuFriend, 691 F. 2d 948, 951-52 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173, 103 S.Ct. 820, 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983). The quantity of the drug possessed is a circumstance which may permit the inference that the possessor intended to sell, deliver, or otherwise distribute. United States v. Espinosa, 771 F. 2d 1382, 1397 n. 1…