HABERSKI

v.

MAINE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984)
  …To justify the individual examination of grand jurors the pre-in-dictment publicity must be so invidious as to cause vindictive and retributive feelings among the members of the community. State v. Haberski, 449 A. 2d 373 (Me.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1174, 103 S.Ct. 823, 74 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983). We therefore find Bundy was entitled to neither a temporary restraining order nor an opportunity to voir dire the individual members of the grand jury. See Porter v. State, 400 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1981). Appellan…
• Lewis v. State, 497 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …t knew or should have known of the essential facts which would permit him to take advantage of the favorable evidence. United States v. Torres, 719 F. 2d 549, 555 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. LeRoy, 687 F. 2d 610, 618 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1174, 103 S.Ct. 823, 74 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983). “This is especially true where a defendant and the state have the same access to the sought-after information.” James v. State, 453 So. 2d 786, 790 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1098, 105 S.Ct. 608, 83 L.Ed.2…
• United States v. Estrada, 733 F.2d 683 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …filed, 52 U.S.L.W. 3777 (U.S. April 24, 1984). Accord United States v. Freire, 710 F. 2d 1515 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1277, 79 L.Ed.2d 681 (1984); United States v. Burns, 684 F. 2d 1066, 1074 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1174, 103 S.Ct. 823, 74 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983). These cases indicate that decisions limiting the exclusionary rule are fully retroactive. No other result makes sense. The purpose of refusing to apply retroactively a new decision enforcing the exclusionary…