UNITED STATES

v.

ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. ONE Assortment OF 89 Firearms, 465 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1984)
  …judges argued that neither collateral estoppel nor double jeopardy should preclude forfeiture proceedings brought under § 924(d). 685 F. 2d, at 918-919 (Winter, J., joined by Butzner, Russell, and Murnaghan, JJ., dissenting). We granted certiorari, 459 U. S. 1199 (1983), and we reverse. I In Coffey v. United States, supra, this Court held that a forfeiture action brought against certain distilling equipment was barred by the owner’s prior acquittal on charges of removing and concealing distilled spirits wi…
• Consol. Rail Corp. v. Darrone, 465 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1984)
  …unds, a decision that has more drastic consequences for the funded programs than do private suits for individual relief. We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict among the Circuits and to consider other questions under the Rehabilitation Act.6 459 U. S. 1199 (1983). We affirm. [*630] HH J-H I — I We are met initially by petitioner’s contention that the death of the plaintiff LeStrange has mooted the case and deprives the Court of jurisdiction for that reason.7 Petitioner concedes, however, that there r…
• Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (U.S. 1984)
  …on the execution of an Assurance of Compliance and that the Department had acted properly in terminating federal financial assistance to the students and Grove City despite the lack of evidence of actual discrimination. [*563] We granted certiorari, 459 U. S. 1199 (1983), and we now affirm the Court of Appeals’ judgment that the Department could terminate BEOG’s received by Grove City’s students to force the College to execute an Assurance of Compliance. t-H I — H In defending its refusal to execute the Ass…