HORTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …the seventy-day clock, as does § 3161(d)(1), and there is no reason to suppose that it would trigger a new thirty-day minimum, either. This was the conclusion we reached in United States v. Horton, 676 F. 2d 1165, 1170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201, 103 S.Ct. 1184, 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983), the facts of which are indistinguishable from the facts of the case at bar. If Horton is still good law, it is disposi-tive. Librizzi urges us to overrule Horton, because it erroneously assumes that whether a…
• United States v. Gallo, 763 F.2d 1504 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …t by the statutory 30-day requirement. See United States v. Todisio, 667 F. 2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906,102 S.Ct. 1250, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982), and United States v. Horton, 676 F. 2d 1165, 1170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201, 103 S.Ct. 1184, 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); see also Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Guidelines to the Administration of the Speedy Trial Act oif 1979 (1981) at 14 (30-day period does…
• United States v. LaSPESA, 956 F.2d 1027 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …1986). Even the Second Circuit, which decided Johnpoll, has rejected any inference that the case should be interpreted as finding section 2314 inapplicable to wire transfers. United States v. Gilboe, 684 F. 2d 235, 238 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201, 103 S.Ct. 1185, 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983). 2. Prosecutor’s Closing Argument Murgo contends that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to state three times in his closing argument that Victor Murgo had never procured a single loan for any cl…