MOODY

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Kayle Barrington Bates v. State, 465 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1985)
  …nces because we cannot know if the result would have been different if the impermissible circumstances had not been used. Oats; Lewis v. State, 377 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1979); Menendez; Riley. See Moody v. State, 418 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214, 103 S.Ct. 1213, 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983). Hence, we vacate the death sentence and remand to the trial court for a reweighing of the valid aggravating circumstances against the mitigating evidence. Bates’ convictions are affirmed as are the sentences…
• Lavado v. State, 469 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …orated as the circumstances surrounding the juror under examination in relation to the case on trial would seem to require _” Pinder v. State, 27 Fla. 370, 375, 8 So. 837, 838 (1891). See Moody v. State, 418 So. 2d 989, 993 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214, 103 S.Ct. 1213, 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983); Lewis v. State, 377 So. 2d 640, 642-43 (Fla.1979). Thus, where a juror’s attitude about a particular legal doctrine (in the words of the trial court, “the law”) [*920] is essential to a determination of wheth…
• Gunn v. State, 641 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …we recognize that the court could, and perhaps should, have afforded counsel more leeway, the court’s ruling did not rise to the degree of abuse of discretion mandating reversal. See generally Moody v. State, 418 So. 2d 989 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214, 103 S.Ct. 1213, 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983); Essix v. State, 347 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 357 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1978). Therefore, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and we remand for resentencing as to counts II and III. ANSTEAD a…