MITSUI & CO., LTD., ET AL.

v.

INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Mack v. Newton, 737 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …raud because there is no evidence or finding of detrimental reliance by creditors or the damage occasioned thereby. See generally Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F. 2d 1149, 1171-72 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007, 103 S.Ct. 1245, 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), rehearing en banc granted following remand, 718 F. 2d 725, 730 (5th Cir.1983); Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Texas Bank & Trust Co. of Dallas, 516 S.W. 2d 138, 143 (Tex.1974); Sawyer v. Pierce, 580 S.W. 2d 117, 124…
• Silas J. Alexander v. Chicago Park Dist., 773 F.2d 850 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …on, 747 F. 2d 820, 822-23 (1st Cir.1984); Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 701 F. 2d 653, 657 (7th Cir.1983); Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F. 2d 1149, 1191 (5th Cir.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007, 103 S.Ct. 1254, 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1983). There is no doubt that two of the three Lummas Co. factors have been met here. The jury rendered a verdict only after a protracted' trial. See also Aiello v. City of Wilmington, 470 F.Supp. 414, 419 (D.Del.19…
• Swentek v. Usair, Inc., 830 F.2d 552 (4th Cir. 1987)
  …y” determination. See Alexander v. Chicago Park District, 773 F. 2d 850, 855 (7th Cir.1985); O’Reilly v. Malon, 747 F. 2d 820, 823 (1st Cir.1984); Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F. 2d 1149, 1191 (5th Cir.1982) vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007, 103 S.Ct. 1245, 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). Finality for purposes of collateral estoppel is a flexible concept and “may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason fo…