SILKWOOD, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SILKWOOD

v.

KERR-MCGEE CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Petersburg Yacht Charters, Inc. v. Morgan Yacht, Inc., 457 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …zes why the conduct is not “price fixing” as that term is generally used in antitrust law. Section B(2)(b) deals with [*1037] three cases, Cernuto, Muenster, and Spray-Rite Service Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 684 F. 2d 1226 (7th Cir.1982), cert. granted, 460 U.S. 1010, 103 S.Ct. 1249, 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).2 Cernuto and Spray-Rite are leading cases taking the position that conduct of the type alleged here constitutes a price restriction. We critique those cases and explain why we believe they are incorrect. We ex…
• Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Serv. Corp., 465 U.S. 752 (U.S. 1984)
  …erminated a price-cutting distributor in response to or following complaints by other distributors. This view brought the Seventh Circuit into direct conflict with a number of other Courts of Appeals.5 We granted cer-tiorari to resolve the conflict. 460 U. S. 1010 (1983). We reject the statement by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit of the standard of proof required to submit a case to the jury in distributor-termination litigation, but affirm the judgment under the standard we announce today.6 [*76…
• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1984)
  …” id., at 409. The court concluded that respondent’s showing entitled him to a hearing under the new standard. Because of the importance of the question presented, and because of the conflict in the Circuits on the question,4 we granted certiorari, 460 U. S. 1010 (1983). We now reverse and hold that an alien must establish a clear probability of persecution to avoid deportation under § 243(h). I — I I — I The basic contentions of the parties in this case may be summarized briefly. Petitioner contends that…