WYETH GOSNELL, PETITIONER,
v.
GUY CASKEY RAMBLER COMPANY, CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
WYETH GOSNELL, PETITIONER,
GUY CASKEY RAMBLER COMPANY, CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
213 So. 2d 418
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 1, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
CALDWELL, C. J., DREW, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Agrico Chem. Co. & Crawford Risk Mgmt. Servs. v. Tucker, 511 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…e of maximum medical improvement. Section 440.28, Florida Statutes (1977), provides that an award of increased benefits as a result of modification proceedings may be made effective from the date of the injury. In Sierra v. Deauville Operating Co., 213 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1968), the court acknowledged this provision, stating that, assuming there is evidence to support the designation, the deputy may designate a prior date from which a modification order should be effective. Sierra at 420 (emphasis in original).…
-
Fred Howland, Inc. v. Adolph Rutkauskas & Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 216 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 1968)…mpact of this provision in the instant case because the point is not raised. In some instances, especially where permanent, total disability results from a change, such a provision could present difficult problems. Sierra v. Deauville Operating Co., 213 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1968). Furthermore, in fixing the attorneys’ fee the deputy did not comply with our opinion in Lee Engineering & Construction Co. v. Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454 (Fla.1968). Inasmuch as no objection on these grounds is raised by petitioner we will n…
-
Repasky v. Junior's Rest., 224 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1969)…the evidence produced bearing on the authorization for medical treatment. We must decide whether the deputy’s order was supported by competent substantial evidence. We find that it was. As this Court held in Sierra v. Deauville Operating Co., (Fla.) 213 So. 2d 418, we are not the trier of the facts and the scope of our appellate authority does not permit us to re-evaluate the weight and credibility of the evidence and measure the soundness of the Judge’s order by that standard. It is our opinion that the Flo…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence