DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES STEEL SUPPLY, DIVISION OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Harris v. State, 563 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …urth Amendment does not preclude admission of that evidence in a civil proceeding. See United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 96 S.Ct. 3021, 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); Tirado v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 689 F. 2d 307, (2d Cir.1982), cert. den., 460 U.S. 1014, 103 S.Ct. 1256, 75 L.Ed.2d 484 (1983); Jonas v. City of Atlanta, 647 F. 2d 580 (5th Cir.1981). In contrast, forfeiture provides an additional penalty for violating a criminal law to which Fourth Amendment principles absolutely apply. Jonas, 647 F.…
• Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 777 F.2d 113 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …banc). Under this analysis, we have generally held that claims under § 1981 are governed in Pennsylvania by that state’s six-year statute of limitations. See, e.g., Davis v. United States Steel Supply, 581 F. 2d 335, 341 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1014, 103 S.Ct. 1256, 75 L.Ed.2d 484 (1983); Meyers v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Ass’n, 559 F. 2d 894, 902-03 (3d Cir.1977). In Davis, we held that a § 1981 claim of racial discrimination in employment, the gravamen of which was interference with e…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Gavalik v. Cont'l CAN Co., 812 F.2d 834 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …ion of "the essential nature of the federal claim within the scheme created by the various state statutes of limitation." Davis v. United States Steel Supply, 581 F. 2d 335, 337 (3d Cir.1978), resubmitted, 688 F. 2d 166 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1014, 103 S.Ct. 1256, 75 L.Ed.2d 484 (1983). Rather, Garcia held that, regardless of that characterization, for purposes of § 1983, the state limitations period for personal injury claims would govern. See also Knoll II, 763 F. 2d at 585 ("In Wilson v.…