NEW ORLEANS STEAMSHIP ASSN.
v.
WILLIAMS ET AL.; AND INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSN. ET AL. V. WILLIAMS ET AL.
NEW ORLEANS STEAMSHIP ASSN.
WILLIAMS ET AL.; AND INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSN. ET AL. V. WILLIAMS ET AL.
460 U.S. 1038
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Ariz. Governing Comm. for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Comp. Plans v. Norris, 463 U.S. 1073 (U.S. 1983)…erence here than it did in Ford that the employer engaged third parties to provide a particular benefit rather than directly providing the benefit itself. See Williams v. New Orleans Steamship Assn., 673 F. 2d 742, 750-751 (CA5 1982), cert. denied, 460 U. S. 1038 (1983); Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F. 2d 918, 926 (CA9), modified and rehearing denied, 28 FEP Cases 1820, cert. denied, 459 U. S. 971 (1982); Farmer v. ARA Services, Inc., 660 F. 2d 1096, 1104 (CA6 1981); Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.,…
-
Rendon v. AT & T Techs., 883 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1989)…ich we affirmed as not clearly erroneous liability determinations based on statistical evidence showing three standard deviations is misplaced. See Williams v. New Orleans Steamship Association, 673 F. 2d 742, 749 n. 13 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1038, 103 S.Ct. 1428, 75 L.Ed.2d 789 (1983) (“A deviation greater than three times the standard [*398] deviation is prima facie proof that the selection system is not random ... ”). AT & T cites no case which “requires” a finding of three standard deviat…
-
Volma Overton v. City OF Austin, 748 F.2d 941 (5th Cir. 1984)…ction 1292(a)(1) are met, nevertheless we restrict “appellate review to the injunctive aspects of the district court’s order.” Association of Co-Operative Members, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc., 684 F. 2d 1134, 1138 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1038, 103 S.Ct. 1428, 75 L.Ed.2d 788 (1983). Applying these principles, we hold that the district court has issued no order ap-pealable under section 1292(a)(1). Appellants, plaintiffs and plaintiffs-intervenors, have made interlocutory requests for pe…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence