TROLIA

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. Pulley, 885 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …ll of specifics), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922, 102 S.Ct. 1280, 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Moore v. Smith, 694 F. 2d 115, 118 (6th Cir.1982) [*1367] (prejudice found where defense counsel had no recollection why direct appeal was not taken), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1044 (1983); Cotton v. Mabry, 674 F. 2d 701, 705 (8th Cir.) (prejudice found where police, witnesses, and defense counsel had no recollection of trial), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1015, 103 S.Ct. 374, 74 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982); Bowen v. Murphy, 698 F. 2d 381, 38…
• Strahan v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 438 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …judge, prosecutor and defense counsel. (Questionable whether Rule 9(a) actually relied on for dismissal of petition. See comments in dissent (Nathaniel R. Jones, J.) 687 F. 2d at 874 n. 1. Moore v. Smith, 694 F. 2d 115 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1044, 103 S.Ct. 1442, 75 L.Ed.2d 798 (1983). 11 year delay State prejudiced because: i. all pertinent records destroyed; and ii. counsel had no recollection why direct appeal was not taken. Buchanon v. Mintzes, 734 F. 2d 274 (6th Cir. 1984) (on conf…
• LaVille Hannon v. Herb Maschner & Attorney Gen. of the State of Kan., 845 F.2d 1553 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …n equitable affirmative defense.”); Alexander, 719 F. 2d at 1246 (“Rule 9(a) must be carefully con-sidered_”); Moore v. Smith, 694 F. 2d 115, 117 (6th Cir.1982) (application must be limited to avoid abrogation of very purpose of writ), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1044, 103 S.Ct. 1442, 75 L.Ed.2d 798 (1983); McDonnell, 666 F. 2d at 251 (same); Davis v. Adult Parole Authority, 610 F. 2d 410, 413-14 (6th Cir.1979) (same). In considering whether to dismiss a habeas petition, the district court should weigh any releva…