JOSE ABBAY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-07-09
No. 67-912
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
213 So. 2d 505 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968) Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below following his conviction in the criminal court of record of Dade County of the offense of Unlawful Practice of Medicine. His trial was held before a jury on September 11 and 12, 1967.

On authority of the case of Bryson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 246, we must reject as without merit the contention of the appellant that the jury before which he was tried was chosen from a panel of jurors not constituted as required by Ch. 67-154 then in effect. We have considered the further contention of appellant that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and on examination of the record we conclude that the judgment has adequate evidentiary support.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Chavez-Rey v. Chavez-Rey, 213 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
    …that the requirements set forth by the Second District Court of Appeal in Sharp are not applicable because the case before us involves a direct contempt, a contemptuous act committed in the presence of the court. Cf. McDaniel v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 505 (opinion filed August 13, 1968). The procedural requirements for prosecuting a direct criminal contempt are set forth in Rule 1.830, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure: “A criminal contempt may be punished summarily if the court saw or heard the c…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw