INNELLA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Lewis, 759 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …ct court could consolidate Darnall’s trial with that of his ten codefendants. The evidentiary and procedural complexity of this large trial certainly justified the continuance, United States v. Brooks, 697 F. 2d 517, 521 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1071, 103 S.Ct. 1526, 75 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983), particularly in light of the brevity of the delay. Accordingly, we find no error. Y. PAULA LEWIS. Paula Lewis argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction for cocaine distribution and…
• United States v. Pennell, 737 F.2d 521 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …duct as criminal in nature. The acts should be unique rather than so commonplace that they are engaged in by persons not in violation of the law. Everett, 700 F. 2d at 909; United States v. Innella, 690 F. 2d 834, 835 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1071, 103 S.Ct. 1526, 75 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); United States v. Oviedo, 525 F. 2d 881, 885 (5th Cir.1976); see also United States v. McDowell, 705 F. 2d 426, 428 (11th Cir.1983). In other words, the defendant’s objective conduct, taken as a whole, must une…
• United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1984)
  …be given retroactive effect — that the order granting a continuance must be made at the outset of the excludable period. Janik, 723 F. 2d at 545; United States v. Brooks, 697 F. 2d 517, 522 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom. Reed v. United States, 460 U.S. 1071, 103 S.Ct. 1526, 75 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); but see United States v. Cameron, 510 F.Supp. 645, 649-50 (D.Md.1981). This court has not addressed the question, United States v. Jodoin, 672 F. 2d 232, 237 (1st Cir.1982), and need not do so now. Appellants…