FIELDS

v.

SUMMIT ENGINEERING

Citator

Cited By

• Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43 (U.S. 1997)
  …tiatives made law of the State. Nor has this Court ever identified initiative proponents as Article-III-qualified defenders of the measures they advocated. Cf. Don’t Bankrupt Washington Committee v. Continental Ill. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 460 U. S. 1077 (1983) (summarily dismissing, for lack of standing, appeal by an initiative proponent from a decision holding the initiative unconstitutional). AOE also asserts representational or associational standing. An association has standing to sue or defen…
• Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693 (U.S. 2013)
  …20 U.S., at 65, 117 S.Ct. 1055 ("Nor has this Court ever identified initiative proponents as Article-III-qualified defenders of the measures they advocated."); Don't Bankrupt Washington Committee v. Continental Ill. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 460 U.S. 1077, 103 S.Ct. 1762, 76 L.Ed.2d 338 (1983) (summarily dismissing, for lack of standing, appeal by an initiative proponent from a decision holding the initiative unconstitutional). III A Without a judicially cognizable interest of their own, petitione…
• Parsons v. Health & Human Servs., 762 F.2d 1188 (4th Cir. 1985)
  …tled to intestate distribution from his deceased father’s estate. Nevertheless, as the Secretary points out, recovery of benefits in the Fourth Circuit is barred by Jones v. Schweiker, 668 F. 2d 755 (4th Cir.1981), vacated sub nom. Jones v. Heckler, 460 U.S. 1077, 103 S.Ct. 1763, 76 L.Ed.2d 339 (1983).* Jones, in contrast to Handley, holds that even if a state intestacy statute is unconstitutional, the illegitimate child is not entitled to benefits. Ill Section 416(h)(3)(C)(ii) qualifies an illegitimate ch…