IN RE SHABAZZ

Citator

Cited By

• Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1984)
  …pport an inference of actual malice.” Id., at 197.8 [*493] We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred when it refused to apply the clearly-erroneous standard of Rule 52(a) to the District Court’s “finding” of actual malice. 461 U. S. 904 (1983). I — ( To place the issue m focus, it is necessary to state m somewhat greater detail (a) the evidence on the “actual malice” issue; and (b) the basis for the District Court’s determination. Evidence of Actual Malice. At trial petitioner…
• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210 (U.S. 1984)
  …held that the individual questioning of respondents violated the Fourth Amendment because there had been no such reasonable suspicion or probable cause as to any of them.3 [*215] We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 461 U. S. 904 (1983), because it has serious implications for the enforcement of the immigration laws and presents a conflict with the decision reached by the Third Circuit in Babula v. INS, 665 F. 2d 293 (1981). The Fourth Amendment does not proscribe all conta…
• Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1984)
  …ratory relief under § 1983,3 the court concluded that prospective relief properly had been awarded against petitioner. It therefore affirmed the award of attorney’s fees. Allen v. Burke, 690 F. 2d 376 (1982). II We granted certiorari in this case, 461 U. S. 904 (1983), to determine, as petitioner phrased the question, “[wjhether Judicial Immunity Bars the Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 1988 Against a Member of the Judiciary Acting in his Judicial Capacity.” See the initial leaf of the p…