CHRISTIAN

v.

MASSACHUSETTS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Jordan, 870 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …nd convicted Jordan for two separate crimes. Unlike American Honda, Jordan was not placed in a situation so fundamentally unfair that he was deprived of due process of law. Cf. United States v. DeMichael, 692 F. 2d 1059 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 907, 103 S.Ct. 1878, 76 L.Ed.2d 809 (1983) (prosecu-torial discretion allows federal prosecutor to await final disposition of similar state prosecution before dropping charges or proceeding with federal prosecution). C. Ex Post Facto A law violates th…
• Caribbean Marine Servs. Co., Inc. v. Baldrige, 844 F.2d 668 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …Fairman, 678 F. 2d 52, 54-55 (7th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (conflict between privacy interest of inmates and state’s duty to refrain from discrimination in employment of guards ordinarily should be resolved by reasonable accommodations), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 907, 103 S.Ct. 1879, 76 L.Ed.2d 810 (1983). Therefore, we cannot automatically say, based on the record before us, that the privacy interests “decidedly” outweigh the important governmental interest in providing equal employment opportunities for its e…
• Mudd v. United States, 798 F.2d 1509 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …r, and found a sixth amendment violation. 736 F. 2d at 1436-37; see also Stubbs v. Bordenkircher, 689 F. 2d 1205, 1206 (4th Cir.1982) (trial court order not to discuss testimony during lunch hour held “constitutionally impermissible”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 907, 103 S.Ct. 1879, 76 L.Ed.2d 810 (1983). In short, the district judge’s order violated the sixth amendment. Some courts have held, though, that a defendant waives his right if no timely objection is made. See Stubbs, 689 F. 2d at 1207; Bailey v. Red…