NEUFELD

v.

BAMBROUGH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Zaldivar v. City OF LOS Angeles, 780 F.2d 823 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …reason is apparent why a similar rule should not apply with respect to the bilingual provisions. Challenges to the Act itself must be filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Reich v. Larson, 695 F. 2d 1147 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 915, 103 S.Ct. 1894, 77 L.Ed.2d 284 (1983). We need not decide the jurisdictional issue here. We determine in this case only that the filing of the instant action in federal court, after dismissal of similar legal contentions raised in an earlier and r…
• Grillet v. Sears, 927 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …de Bank, 873 F. 2d 859, 865-66 (5th Cir.1989); Morta v. Korea Ins. Corp., 840 F. 2d 1452 (9th Cir. 1988); Anselmo v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., 771 F. 2d 417 (8th Cir.1985); DiRose v. PK Management Corp., 691 F. 2d 628 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 915, 103 S.Ct. 1896, 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (1983). Grillet argues that the doctrine of ratification is inapplicable because she tendered back the full amount of consideration with accrued interest to Sears. Grillet did offer to pay back the money received for…
• Watson v. City OF Newark, 746 F.2d 1008 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …f challenged rate order but unsuccessfully sought to appeal portions of the decree fixing the value of its property and the rate of return to be allowed); In re First Colonial Corp. of America, 693 F. 2d 447, 449-50 n. 5 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied 461 U.S. 915, 103 S.Ct. 1896, 77 L.Ed.2d 285 (“One may not appeal an issue upon which one prevailed absent exceptional circumstances.”); In re Arthur Treacher’s Franchisee Litigation, 689 F. 2d 1137, 1149 n. 16 (3d Cir.1982) (plaintiff who had obtained a prelimi…