COUSINO

v.

STAIR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STAIR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1987)
  …hat these are criminal laws which Pub. L. 280 permits it to enforce on the reservations. Following its earlier decision in Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, San Diego County, Cal. v. Duffy, 694 F. 2d 1185 (1982), cert. denied, 461 U. S. 929 (1983), which also involved the applicability of §326.5 of the California Penal Code to Indian reservations, the Court of Appeals rejected this submission. 783 F. 2d, at 901-903. In Barona, applying what it thought to be the civil/criminal dichotomy…
• United States v. Brewer, 899 F.2d 503 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …ts. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e) (emphasis added). This standard is the one which we apply in similar settings when questions of the relevancy of facts are at issue. See, e.g., In re Beverly Hills Fire Litigation, 695 F. 2d 207 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929, 103 S.Ct. 2090, 77 L.Ed.2d 300 (1983); Drayton v. Jiffee Chem. Corp., 591 F. 2d 352 (6th Cir.1978); 10 Moore’s Federal Practice § 401.03[6] (1988) (district court has broad discretion in applying concepts of relevancy and materiality, and its rulin…
• United States v. Paone, 782 F.2d 386 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …ngly reduces the risk that any single error may have prejudicial effect upon the ultimate result.” United States v. Jones, 766 F. 2d 994, 1004 (6 Cir. 1985) (quoting In re Beverly Hills Fire Litigation, 695 F. 2d 207, 227 (6 Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 (1983)). In addition to his claim under Ruje 801(d)(2)(E), appellant asserts that the admission of hearsay statements of co-conspirators violated his rights under the confrontation clause. The statements, according to appellant, did not contain suf…