LOCHNER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (74 total)

• Elvin Lee Moore v. State, 468 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …vidence, if not insubstantial or inherently incredible, is sufficient standing alone to present a jury question as to the defendant’s guilt, see United States v. Raffone, 693 F. 2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom. Farese v. United States, 461 U.S. 931, 103 S.Ct. 2094, 77 L.Ed.2d 303 (1983); and (2) the defendant’s claim that his trial on the robbery charge should have been dismissed on double jeopardy grounds because he had been previously convicted in the county court of the necessarily-included…
• Duffell v. S. Walton Emergency Servs., Inc., 501 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …ostner, 684 F. 2d 370, 373 (6th Cir.1982) (Federal Rule 106 is simply a regulation of the order of proof and does not make admissible evidence that is barred by other rules); accord United States v. Terry, 702 F. 2d 299, 314 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931, 103 S.Ct. 2095, 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); United States v. Burreson, 643 F. 2d 1344, 1349 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 830, 847, 102 S.Ct. 125, 165, 70 L.Ed.2d 106, 135 (1981). Neither do I believe that the error can be deemed harmless under th…
• Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1986)
  …right to testify in his own behalf, cases in several Circuits have so held, and the right has long been assumed. See, e. g., United States v. Curtis, 742 F. 2d. 1070, 1076 (CA7 1984); United States v. Bifield, 702 F. 2d 342, 349 (CA2), cert. denied, 461 U. S. 931 (1983). We have also suggested that such a right exists as a corollary to the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled testimony, see Harris v. New York, supra, at 225. See also Ferguson, 365 U. S., at 598-601 (concurring opinion of Frankfurter,…