HARVEY C. POE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF GEORGE C. HANCOCK, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., A CORPORATION, MILDRED CARON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE C. HANCOCK, DECEASED, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1968-09-09
No. 1622
WALDEN, C. J., and REED, J., concur.
213 So. 2d 723 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1968)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the beneficiary designation 'Harvey C. Poe, Trustee for the Estate of George C. Hancock' intended the estate, not Poe individually, to receive the policy proceeds.


Facts & Procedural History

An insurance company interpleaded parties to determine who was entitled to life insurance proceeds. The insured initially named his wife as beneficiar…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MURPHREE, JOHN A. H., Associate Judge.

MURPHREE, JOHN A. H., Associate Judge.

American National Insurance Company interplead the administratrix of the Estate of George C. Hancock, deceased, and Harvey C. Poe to determine which became entitled to the proceeds of the insurance policy on the life of George C. Hancock when he died.

When the policy was written the insured caused his wife to be named beneficiary, but then there were marital difficulties and the beneficiary was changed by the insured to “Harvey C. Poe, trustee for the Estate of George C. Hancock”. In this suit Poe endeavored to prove that despite the beneficiary designation as stated Hancock really intended that Poe personally should receive the proceeds of this policy instead of Hancock’s estate, which meant Hancock’s three minor children.

In his final judgment the trial judge concluded as follows:

“a. The beneficiary designation ‘Harvey C. Poe, Trustee for the Estate of George C. Hancock’ was intended to designate that the ultimate beneficiary be the estate of the insured, George C. Hancock, *724and it was not intended that Harvey C. Poe, individually, receive the policy proceeds to the exclusion of the estate of the insured, but on the contrary, that Harvey C. Poe be designated a Trustee to accomplish the intended results * *

Without going into the effect of the Dead Man’s Statute or the parole evidence rule with respect to certain aspects of the evidence, it is sufficient to say that the evidence in its entirety amply supports the conclusion of the trial judge.

It follows that the final judgment should be and it is hereby affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw