ROBERT E. HUDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CANAL AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, A BODY CORPORATE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1968-09-05
No. 1-408
JOHNSON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and PATTEN, GEO. L., Associate Judge, concur.
213 So. 2d 727 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1968)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have studied the record and briefs filed herein and heard argument of counsel and are convinced and so hold that the primary questions involved herein have been answered adversely to the appellant in the following cases: Staplin v. Canal Authority, 208 So.2d 853 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Couse v. Canal Authority, 197 So.2d 841 (Fla.App. 1st, 1967) and 209 So.2d 865 (Fla.1968) and therefore on the authority of the cases cited supra, the order appealed from is hereby Affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and PATTEN, GEO. L., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw