CELE
v.
KINNEY ET AL.; FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES; GRAY V. LUCAS, WARDEN, ET AL.; STEWART V. FLORIDA; COPELAND V. SOUTH CAROLINA; CYNTJE V. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ET AL.; SMITH V. BORDENKIRCHER, WARDEN, WEST VIRGINIA STATE PENITENTIARY; THOMPSON V. MEDICAL OFFICER AT HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL, IN RE BEHRENS ET AL.
CELE
KINNEY ET AL.; FREEMAN V. UNITED STATES; GRAY V. LUCAS, WARDEN, ET AL.; STEWART V. FLORIDA; COPELAND V. SOUTH CAROLINA; CYNTJE V. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ET AL.; SMITH V. BORDENKIRCHER, WARDEN, WEST VIRGINIA STATE PENITENTIARY; THOMPSON V. MEDICAL OFFICER AT HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL, IN RE BEHRENS ET AL.
462 U.S. 1124
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Caution
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Michutka v. State, 506 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…sel can be raised on direct appeal, generally it is a collateral matter which should be raised by a motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So. 2d 862 (Fla.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103, 103 S.Ct. 1802, 76 L.Ed.2d 366, reh. denied, 462 U.S. 1124, 103 S.Ct. 3099, 77 L.Ed.2d 1357 (1982). We reverse the denial of relief and remand with instructions that the circuit court correct the judgment and sentence to reflect a second degree misdemeanor conviction for the charge of defrauding an innkeep…
-
DI Battisto v. State, 480 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…verdict and conclude that the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel is cognizable only in a subsequent Rule 3.850 proceeding. Stewart v. State, 420 So. 2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103, 103 S.Ct. 1802, 76 L.Ed.2d 366, reh. denied, 462 U.S. 1124, 103 S.Ct. 3099, 77 L.Ed.2d 1357 (1983); Whitaker v. State, 433 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); cf. Gordon v. State, 469 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Affirmed. . The defendant does not argue and we do not believe that it is necessary to go as f…
-
Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (U.S. 1990)…with whom he admittedly had no dispute and who posed no danger to him, is additional evidence of his ‘shockingly evil state of mind’”); State v. Zaragoza, 135 Ariz. 63, 69, 659 P. 2d 22, 28 (“The victim in this case was 78 years old”), cert. denied, 462 U. S. 1124 (1983); by the fact the murder was committed to eliminate a witness, see State v. Correll, 148 Ariz. 468, 481, 715 P. 2d 721, 734 (1986); State v. Gillies, 142 Ariz. 564, 570, 691 P. 2d 655, 661 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1059 (1985); State v.…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence