MEADOWS

v.

MCGINNIS, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Parrish v. Johnson, 800 F.2d 600 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …common law, not whether the constitutional provision violated was substantive or procedural. See Doe v. District of Columbia, 697 F. 2d 1115, 1122-23 (D.C.Cir.1983); Lancaster v. Rodriguez, 701 F. 2d 864, 866 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1136, 103 S.Ct. 3121, 77 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1983); see generally Note, Damage Awards for Constitutional Torts: A Reconsideration After Carey v. Phiphus, 93 Harv.L.Rev. 966, 972-74 (1979- [*608] 80). Second, this Court’s opinions in Brandon and Walje, despite…
• Ruggiero v. Krzeminski, 928 F.2d 558 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …sequential damages, the trial judge committed no error in directing the jury to award nominal damages. See, e.g., Farrar v. Cain, 756 F. 2d 1148, 1152 (5th Cir.1985); Lancaster v. Rodriguez, 701 F. 2d 864, 866 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1136, 103 S.Ct. 3121, 77 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1983); Kincaid v. Rusk, 670 F. 2d 737, 746 (7th Cir.1982). Attorney’s fee award Finally, the Officers advance several arguments regarding the award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. First, they argue that…
• Draper v. Davis S. Coombs, 792 F.2d 915 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …in an Eighth Amendment context and expressly rejected [*922] any procedural rights/substantive rights distinction as unhelpful and contrary to the underlying rationale of Piphus. Lancaster v. Rodriguez, 701 F. 2d 864, 866 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1136, 103 S.Ct. 3121, 77 L.Ed.2d 1373 (1983). See also Farrar v. Cain, 756 F. 2d 1148, 1152 (5th Cir.1985) (nominal damages for violation of “civil rights”); Smith v. Coughlin, 748 F. 2d 783, 789 (2d Cir.1984) (nominal damages for violation of Sixth Am…