HUERTAS
v.
APELLANIS ET AL.

U.S. | 1983-06-20
No. 82-6661
462 U.S. 1137 Supreme Court of the United States (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443 (9th Cir. 1987)
    …y of witnesses Durham, Coots, Revering, and Reel. The credibility of witnesses and the weight accorded the evidence are questions for the jury that are not reviewable. United States v. Burns, 701 F. 2d 840, 842 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1137, 103 S.Ct. 3123, 77 L.Ed.2d 1375 (1983). The testimony of these witnesses is not incredible merely because the witnesses participated in the alleged crimes. See United States v. Casanova, 642 F. 2d 300, 301 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454…
  • Hassine v. Jeffes, 846 F.2d 169 (3d Cir. 1988)
    …e free from the “unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” Id; accord Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981); Gibson v. Lynch, 652 F. 2d 348, 352 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, sub nom. Stanley v. Zimmerman, 462 U.S. 1137, 103 S.Ct. 3123, 77 L.Ed.2d 1375 (1983); cf. Benson v. Cady, 761 F. 2d 335, 339 (7th Cir.1985) (“[t]he eighth amendment duty articulated in Estelle has not been limited to elementary services necessary to protect inmates’ health. The state also has…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw