STRICKLAND, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF STRICKLAND

v.

ROOSEVELT COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (106 total)

• Chicone v. State, 684 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1996)
  …cisions, including: Skelton v. State, 609 So. 2d 716, 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Moffatt v. State, 583 So. 2d 779, 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Kuhn v. State, 439 So. 2d 291, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250, 252 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77' L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); and Wale v. State, 397 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We hold that guilty knowledge is an element of possession of a controlled substance under sect…
• Herrera v. State, 532 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …of contraband are (1) the ability to exercise dominion and control over the contraband; (2) knowledge of the presence of the contraband; and (3) knowledge of the illicit nature of the contraband. Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Johnson v. State, 456 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Kuhn v. State, 439 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Where contraband is found on premises under joint rather than exclusive possession, knowledge of the co…
• Dupree v. State, 705 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …had dominion and control over the contraband, that he must have knowledge that the contraband was within his presence, and he must have knowledge of the illicit nature of the contraband. Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250, 252 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983)(citing Wale v. State, 397 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)). If the premises on which the contraband is found is in joint, rather than exclusive, possession of a defendant, knowledge of the presence of the contr…