SOLEM, WARDEN, SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PENITENTIARY

v.

STUMES

Citator

Cited By

• Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638 (U.S. 1984)
  …tions: whether the conduct of the police in this case violated Edwards, whether the District Court adequately deferred to the state court’s factfinding, and whether Edwards should be applied retroactively. We granted certiorari only as to the third. 463 U. S. 1228 (1983). We therefore assume for present purposes that the conduct at issue here violated Edwards. We need not decide whether the police also violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), a question not considered by the Court of Appeals. Beca…
• Wainwright v. Goode, 464 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1983)
  …t may affect a lower court’s decision, our practice has generally been to grant the petition for certiorari, vacate the lower court judgment, and remand for further consideration in light of the intervening decision. See, e. g., Wainwright v. Henry, 463 U. S. 1228 (1983). In the present case, as the Court acknowledges, our recent decision in Barclay v. Florida, 463 [*88] U. S. 939 (1983), plainly bears upon the constitutional questions considered by the Court of Appeals. That the Court today chooses to revers…
• Hopland Band OF Pomo Indians v. The United States, 855 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
  …d Ranchería, was to be terminated and the trust property or proceeds from the sale of such property distributed to eligible individ [*1575] ual Indians. See generally Duncan v. United States, 667 F. 2d 36, 38-40, 229 Ct.Cl. 120 (1981), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1228, 103 S.Ct. 3569, 77 L.Ed.2d 1410 (1983); Smith v. United States, 515 F.Supp. 56, 57-58 (N.D.Cal.1978). Under sections 1 and 2 of the Act, termination of an individual ranchería and distribution of its assets were to be carried out in accordance wit…

  ← 1 / 2 →