BARTLETT ET AL.

v.

WILLIAMS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1991)
  …terials. To require any sort of a contested court hearing or bond before the notice of lien takes effect would largely defeat the purpose of these statutes. Petitioners in their brief rely in part on our summary af-firmance in Bartlett v. Williams, 464 U. S. 801 (1983). That case involved a lis pendens, in which the question presented to this Court was whether such a procedure could be valid when the only protection afforded to the owner of land affected by the lis pendens was a postsequestration hearing. […
• Pinsky v. Duncan, 898 F.2d 852 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …affect real property” and, like section 52-278e, provide only for a post-filing hearing, were upheld against constitutional challenge in Williams v. Bartlett, 189 Conn. 471, 457 A. 2d 290, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 464 U.S. 801, 104 S.Ct. 46, 78 L.Ed.2d 67 (1983). The Supreme Court’s dismissal of this appeal was a dismissal on the merits and a binding precedent, see Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 343-45, 95 S.Ct. 2281, 2288-90, 45 L.Ed.2d 223 (1975); 16 C. Wright, A. Mill…

  ← 1 / 2 →