SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSN. ET AL.

v.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1985)
  …e way pornography is sometimes identified: someone knows it when they see it, but they can’t describe it.” 557 F. Supp., at 453.4 The Secretary and Garcia again took direct appeals from the District Court’s judgment. We noted probable jurisdiction. 464 U. S. 812 (1983). After initial argument, the cases were restored to our calendar for reargument, and the parties were requested to brief and argue the following additional question: “Whether or not the principles of the Tenth Amendment as set forth in Natio…
• Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20 (U.S. 1984)
  …e Halkin, 194 U. S. App. D. C. 257, 598 F. 2d 176 (1979),11 and applies a different standard from that of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in In re San Juan Star Co., 662 F. 2d 108 (1981).12 We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict.13 464 U. S. 812 (1983). We affirm. HH I — I H-l Most States, including Washington, have adopted discovery provisions modeled on Rules 26 through 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. F. James & G. Hazard, Civil Procedure 179 (1977).14 Rule 26(b)(1) provides…
• Sec. Indus. Ass'n v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 468 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1984)
  …w, these features of commercial paper eliminate the concerns that moved Congress to pass the Glass-Steagall Act. Id., at 32-36, 693 F. 2d, at 147-151. Because of the importance of the issue for the Nation’s financial markets, we granted certiorari. 464 U. S. 812 (1983). II The Board is the agency responsible for federal regulation of the national banking system, and its interpretation of a federal banking statute is entitled to substantial deference. As the Court states elsewhere today, “the Board has pri…