CHEVRON CHEMICAL CO.

v.

GILMORE, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By (78 total)

• State v. Percell J. Wise, 664 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …ederal law to prosecute the crime of submitting a false statement to a bank in either the district where the false statement was prepared and mailed or where the statement was received. U.S. v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 814, 104 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). Accord U.S. v. McGre-gor, 503 F. 2d 1167 (8th Cir.1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 926, 95 S.Ct. 1122, 43 L.Ed.2d 395 (1975) (use of mails to defraud may be prosecuted in district where communication sent or receive…
• Jayson Winters v. State, 615 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …it enables the searcher to reasonably ascertain and identify the items authorized to be seized. State v. Showcase Products Inc., 501 So. 2d 11, 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (quoting United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814, 104 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). The purpose of the particularity requirement is to bar exploratory searches by placing limits upon the officer’s discretion in executing a search warrant. Carlton v. State, 449 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1984). The failure…
• United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …age Corporation. The earlier conviction involved the financing of several real estate projects and various scams involving pension funds, insurance companies, and two banks. See United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F. 2d 1343 (11th Cir.1982), cert denied, 464 U.S. 814, 104 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983). Wuagneux argues that double jeopardy bars this prosecution because the alleged misconduct in this case and the earlier case both occurred in the same time frame, involved Rubin and Gopman, and utilized the Sage C…