SANTIAGO

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Wash. Materials, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 803 F.2d 1333 (4th Cir. 1986)
  …6 (4th Cir.1985) (reports by union members that employer was interchanging work and employees with non-union business was sufficient to require disclosure); NLRB v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. & Co., Inc., 696 F. 2d 1120, 1123-26 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 817, 104 S.Ct. 76, 78 L.Ed.2d 88 (1983) (union members’ observations of work interchange at alleged double-breasting job-site were among the reasons cited for finding a duty to disclose). Moreover, as the Board pointed out in its decision, the record es…
• Local 594 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 776 F.2d 1310 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …is supported by circumstantial evidence. The evidence of Miracle’s disparate treatment by the Union also provides an added basis for the Board’s finding of unlawful motivation. NLRB v. Florida Tile Co., 692 F. 2d 34, 35 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 817, 104 S.Ct. 75, 78 L.Ed.2d 87 (1983). The credibility determinations made were not unreasonable under the circumstances, and the standard of review in this area is generally narrow. Local Union No. 948, I.B.E.W. v. NLRB, 697 F. 2d 113, 118 (6th Cir.1…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carpenters Local 608, United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., AFL-CIO, 811 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …long as the dissidents were also motivated by a reasonable belief that they were being treated unfairly by union officials in connection with work assignments. See NLRB v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. & Co., 696 F. 2d 1120, 1126 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 817, 104 S.Ct. 76, 78 L.Ed.2d 88 (1983); Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc. v. NLRB, 229 F. 2d 575, 577 (2d Cir.1956). The union’s arguments challenging the dissidents’ motives do not require extended discussion, and only two arguments warrant any discussio…