FIRST CATHOLIC SLOVAK LADIES ASSN.

v.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Wheeler v. Main Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …th American Signal Co., 704 F. 2d 347 (7th Cir.1983) (corporate vice-president and shareholder considered employee); EEOC v. First Catholic Slovak Ladies Ass’n, 694 F. 2d 1068 (6th Cir.1982), (officers-directors considered employees), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 819, 104 S.Ct. 80, 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983); Hoy v. Progress Pattern Co., 217 F. 2d 701 (6th Cir.1954) (shareholder, vice-president, director and chairman of board considered employee). Cf. Bonilla v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 697 F. 2d 1297 (9th Cir.1982) (…
• Campbell v. State OF Me., 787 F.2d 776 (1st Cir. 1986)
  …he merits during his criminal trial, thus barring relitigation of the issue. See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 103-04, 101 S.Ct. 411, 419-20, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Siano v. Justices of Massachusetts, 698 F. 2d 52, 57 n. 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 819, 104 S.Ct. 80, 78 L.Ed.2d 91 (1983). Finally, the court held that Campbell’s Brady claim must fail because the Brady duty rests exclusively on prosecutors, and they are shielded from civil liability under the absolute immunity of Imbler v. Pachtman,…
• Lilley v. BTM Corp., 958 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …sponding provisions of Title VII. See, e.g., Coburn v. Pan Am, 711 F. 2d 339 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 994, 104 S.Ct. 488, 78 L.Ed.2d 683 (1983); EEOC v. First Catholic Slovak Ladies Ass’n, 694 F. 2d 1068, 1070 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 819, 104 S.Ct. 80, 78 L.Ed.2d 90 (1983). Moreover, ADEA standards governing employment status also apply to Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Act, Mich. Comp.Laws § 37.2101 et seq. Falls v. Sporting News Publishing Co., 834 F. 2d 611, 613 (6th Cir.1987). Theref…