DIXON

v.

DIXON

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• State v. Calhoun, 479 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …ons overheard and recorded is an important one.” (emphasis mine) Tollett v. State, 272 So. 2d 490, 493-494 (Fla.1973). See also Morningstar v. State, 405 So. 2d 778 (4 DCA 1981), decision approved in 428 So. 2d 220 (Fla.1982), certiorari denied in [464 U.S. 821] 104 S.Ct. 86 [78 L.Ed.2d 95]. It is the private conversation that is protected! The fact that the conversation took place in an interview room of the Detective Bureau does not diminish that protection. The State contends that the defendant did not…
• Saud Tarawneh and Ghada Tarawneh v. State, 562 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …whether it would pass muster under Michigan law because in Florida a warrant is not required for law enforcement officers to transmit or record a conversation under these circumstances. Morningstar v. State, 428 So. 2d 220 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 821, 104 S.Ct. 86, 78 L.Ed.2d 95 (1983). Evidence that is validly obtained in another state is admissible into evidence in this state, even if it is obtained through a warrant that would have been invalid if issued in Florida. McClellan v. State, 359 S…
• United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506 (U.S. 1995)
  …., at 772, and a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit holding that materiality in a § 1001 prosecution is a question of “ ‘law’ ” for the court, ibid. (quoting United States v. Abadi, 706 F. 2d 178, 180, cert. denied, 464 U. S. 821 (1983)). But the result in Kungys could be thought to follow a fortiori from the quite different cases of Sinclair and Abadi, whereas nonentitlement under the Sixth Amendment to a jury determination cannot possibly be thought to follow a fortiori…