CURTIS

v.

HECKEL, WARDEN, VANDALIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• State v. Coban, 520 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1988)
  …2 adopts, specifically holds that eligibility for parole is a collateral, not a direct, consequence of a guilty plea. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); Owens v. Wainwright, 698 F. 2d 1111 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 834, 104 S.Ct. 117, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983); Cepulonis v. Ponte, 699 F. 2d 573 (1st Cir.1983); Hunter v. Fogg, 616 F. 2d 55 (2d Cir.1980); Trujillo v. United States, 377 F. 2d 266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 899, 88 S.Ct. 224, 19 L.Ed.2d 221 (1967)…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …by Mr. Cagney. A defendant may not argue as a ground for reversal an issue that was not presented to the trial court. United States v. Hollins, 811 F. 2d 384, 386 (7th Cir.1987); Holleman v. Duckworth, 700 F. 2d 391, 394-95 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 834, 104 S.Ct. 116, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983). The waiver rule is, of course, subject to the plain error doctrine of Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United States v. Fuesting, 845 F. 2d 664, 670-71 (7th Cir.1988). However, content…
• United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …ally held that a litigant cannot present to an appellate court an issue which he did not present to the trial court and which it, therefore, had no opportunity to decide. Holleman v. [*1476] Duckworth, 700 F. 2d 391, 394-95 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 834, 104 S.Ct. 116, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983). The exception to that rule is truly narrow and exists only when a jurisdictional question is raised or in “exceptional circumstances where justice demands more flexibility.” International Travelers Cheque Co.…