BRIDGES

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Barnette, 800 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …y overt act performed in furtherance of a conspiracy. The duration and termination of a conspiracy is determined by the particular facts of each case. United States v. Varella, 692 F. 2d 1352, 1362 (11th Cir.1982) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 838, 104 S.Ct. 127, 78 L.Ed.2d 124 (1983). The evidence showed that many acts were performed and statements made in furtherance of the conspiracy after January 1, 1983 which demonstrated the conspiracy’s continuing nature. For example, in February, 1983…
• United States v. Fernandez, 892 F.2d 976 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …appellant ordinarily must demonstrate “compelling prejudice” flowing from the denial of his motion to sever. United States v. Varella, 692 F. 2d 1352, 1360 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1210, 103 S.Ct. 3542, 77 L.Ed.2d 1392, cert. denied, 464 U.S. 838, 104 S.Ct. 127, 78 L.Ed.2d 124 (1983); United States v. Lippner, 676 F. 2d 456, 464 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Perez, 489 F. 2d 51, 65 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 945, 94 S.Ct. 3067, 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974). To decide whether the a…
• United States v. Anilkumar R. Parikh, 858 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …on the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors. 353 U.S. at 62, 77 S.Ct. at 628-29. In United States v. Varella, 692 F. 2d 1352, 1355-56 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 838, 104 S.Ct. 127, 78 L.Ed.2d 124 (1983), this court analyzed the balance enunciated in Roviaro and determined: [A] factor of primary importance in striking that balance is the degree of participation exercised by the informant. When the confidential…